Monday-Reflection
Nostalgia: Signing Cards In Secret
Tuesday-Paul Presents
CXNX Playlist #1: Homespun Dub-Step
Wednesday-CXNX World Wonders
The REAL Rip Taylor #7: The Inventor of Mr. Potato Head, Really!
Thursday-Inside Ian
Story-Personal Favor
Friday-Ask A Clemente
One Arm, Three Jobs, 12 Inches
Saturday-Caturday
This Cat Knows Cats
Sunday-Unday
Warm Honey Promo
Nostalgia: Signing Cards In Secret
Tuesday-Paul Presents
CXNX Playlist #1: Homespun Dub-Step
Wednesday-CXNX World Wonders
The REAL Rip Taylor #7: The Inventor of Mr. Potato Head, Really!
Thursday-Inside Ian
Story-Personal Favor
Friday-Ask A Clemente
One Arm, Three Jobs, 12 Inches
Saturday-Caturday
This Cat Knows Cats
Sunday-Unday
Warm Honey Promo
Here is another video shot on New Year's Eve after tons of alcohol. This is one of my personal favorites.
Now our Top 100 Songs of 2010 is downloadable for free!
1. Cee-lo :: Fuck You
2. The National :: Conversation 16
3. Sleigh Bells :: Tell 'em
4. M.I.A. :: XXXo
5. MGMT :: Flash Delerium
6. Mumford & Sons :: Little Lion Man
7. Crystal Castles :: Vietnam
8. Sufjan Stevens :: All for Myself
9. Lil' John & Diplo :: Hate U
10. Arcade Fire :: Ready to Start
11. The Qemists :: Dirty Words
12. Murder by Death :: Foxglove
13. Gaslight Anthem :: We Did it When We Were Young
14. O Children :: Ruins
15. Neon Trees :: Animal
16. Awolnation :: Burn it Down
17. Girl Talk :: On and One
18. The Black Keys :: Howlin' For You
19. PS I Love You :: Starfield
20. Steve Aoki :: I'm in the House
21. The National :: Bloodbuzz, OH
22. The Looks :: Romeo
23. Does It Offend You, Yeah? :: We are the Dead
24. CoCo Rosie :: Lemonaide
25. Esser :: Satisfied
26. Xiu Xiu :: Gray Death
27. H.I.M. :: Heartkiller
28. Daft Punk :: Derezzed
29. Dead Weather :: Blue Blood Blues
30. Biffy Clyro :: God & Satan
31. Girls :: Heartbreaker
32. Drivepilot :: Fuck Yeah (FOOL mix)
33. Hypernova :: Fairy Tales
34. Hot Chip :: One Life Stand
35. Karen O :: If You're Gonna Be Dumb ...
36. ROME :: We Who Fell In Love with the Sea
37. These New Puritans :: Orion
38. Yeasayer :: ONE
39. Mumfod & Sons :: I Gave You All
40. Das Racist :: Hahaha JK
41. Django Django :: WOR
42. Belle & Sebastian :: I Want the World to Stop
43. Gogol Bordello :: Immigrandia!
44. LCD Soundsystem :: All I Want
45. Eels :: Spectacular Girl
46. Kayne West :: POWER
47. City of Glass :: The Apologist
48. Jamaica :: By The Numbers
49. Interpol :: Lights
50. Black Rebel Motorcycle Club :: Long Way Down
51. Blizten Trapper :: Into the Void
52. Children Collide :: Jellylegs
53. M.I.A. :: Meds & Feds
54. Arcade Fire :: We Used to Wait
55. Pendulum :: Set Me on Fire
56. Sleigh Bells :: Crown on the Ground
57. Bloodgroup :: My Arms
58. Sharon Jones & The Dap Kings :: I Learned the Hard Way
59. Iron & Wine :: Walking Far from Home
60. The Streets :: Going Through Hell
61. Vampire Weekend :: Giving Up the Gun
62. Gorillaz :: Stylo
63. Isobell Campbell & Mark Lanegan :: Come Undone
64. White Lungs :: Loose Heels
65. Crystal Castles :: Not in Love
66. The Go! Team :: T.O.R.N.A.D.O.
67. Admiral Fallow :: Squealing Pigs
68. Cold War Kids :: Louder than Ever
69. Die Antwoord :: Enter the Ninja
70. Gobble Gobble :: Wrinklecarver
71. Bodies of Water :: Rise up, Careful
72. MUSE :: Neutron Star Collision
73. The Baddes : Open One Eye
74. Pendulum :: Vulture
75. Young Galaxy :: Come and See
76. N.E.R.D. & Daft Punk :: Hypnotize U
77. Brendan Perry :: The Bogus Man
78. Blur :: Fool's Day
79. Call the Doctor :: For Your Leisure
80. Dillinger Escape Plan :: Farewell, Mona Lisa
81. Late of The Pier :: Best in Class
82. Chromeo :: Night by Night
83. IDRchitecture :: (sign of the fish)
84.The Damn Choir :: Black
85. Kele :: Everything You Wanted
86. JJ :: Let Them
87. Kids of 88 :: Everybody Knows
88. Blaudzun :: Midnight Room
89. These New Puritans :: We Want War
90. Chapel Club :: Five Trees
91. Salem :: King Night
92. Diego :: Vienna
93. Cee-lo :: Bright Lights, Bigger City
94. Deadmau5 :: One Trick Pony
95. The Invisible Insects :: The Malcontent
96. Home Video :: I Can Make You Feel It
97. Girl Talk :: Oh No
98. Far East Movement :: Like a G6
99. HURTS :: Better Than Love
100. Bombay Bicycle Club
Did someone say talking cat?
On the streets
In the streets
Headed for the streets
On the street corner
In the alley
On the streets
In the streets
Headed for the streets
On the street corner
In the alley
Greg S.
Indiana PA asks- "How do you handcuff a one-armed man?"
Paul: I am sooooo tired of people wanting to stereotype a one armed man! You think they have nothing else better to do than commit crimes? Listen, I know a one armed man, he is a good standing member of my community, and he refuses his handicap to change his day to day life.
I was talking to him while driving him to his support group to R.A.G.E. (Rick Allen Gathering of Extemitiy-less) and we chat about the everyday nightmare he faces only having one arm. They are just like us really, just that they can't clap at sporting events, shoot a bow and arrow, swim in a straight line, or perform some complicated surgical procedures. He tells me how people expect them to use their feet all the time to overcome their handicap, but you can't expect a grown man to cut a steak with his feet. One-armed people are to be treated with respect, and humility. I will not dignify this question with an answer, as I feel one-armed men AND women should be able to roam free with their own kind peacefully without ridicule and people wanting to arrest them.
Ian: As a deputy advisor on the advisory board for the One Arm Task Force, I strongly advise anyone attempting to apprehend a one-armed man to exercise extreme excessive force.
Canaan P.
Pittsburgh, PA asks - "If you could pick your top 3 "man, it would be awesome to have that job", what would they be...and dont make it about money."
Paul: My list is simple as I have dreamed them since I was young:
1. A member of MC Hammer's posse:
Although, I would have been 12 around the peak of Hammer's fame, being apart of his posse was not only profitable, but incredibly fun. Traveling around the world, and getting paid 6 figures sounds like the perfect job for me; one that requires no effort but affords me the freedom to do what I want. Plus I figure I would have met Boyz 2 Men, Vanilla Ice, and possibly a member from Jodeci during my time with his posse.
2. Pro Wrestling Referee:
What appeals to me is that you are instantly a part of sports history, being there up close with some of the greatest athletes on the planet, and the excitement of the crowd would just get my blood pumping. The plus side is that it seems that you don't have to be aware of anything. You can turn a blind eye to illegality, and when you get touched by anyone you can take a nice 10-15 minute nap having to recollection of anything that happened previously to that. Seems pretty easy job where you only need to count to 3, if you get confronted you fall down and turtle, and if you feel assertive you are the boss and your word is above all.
3. NHL Penalty Box Attendant: After a huge penalty, wouldn't you love just to look the guy in the eye, and tell him "you know, you fucked up". You would inevitably meet all the NHL players during your career, and the only thing you would need to do is count down from 2, 4, 5, or 10 open the door and earn a paycheck.
Ian: First, I'd like to work for the U.S. Mint. I'd get to have complete control over inflation and devaluation. Man, it would be awesome to have that job.
Second, I would like to be the Monopoly banker. Seriously, guys, I know last time, I threw the bank out the window and kicked over the board and said I hated you all because you're a bunch of cheaters, but I swear this time it'll be different. Man it would be awesome to have that job.
Third, I'd like to be MC Hammer's accountant. Talk about getting paid to do nothing! Ha! Man it would be awesome to have that job.
Indiana PA asks- "How do you handcuff a one-armed man?"
Paul: I am sooooo tired of people wanting to stereotype a one armed man! You think they have nothing else better to do than commit crimes? Listen, I know a one armed man, he is a good standing member of my community, and he refuses his handicap to change his day to day life.
One arm? If only ... |
Ian: As a deputy advisor on the advisory board for the One Arm Task Force, I strongly advise anyone attempting to apprehend a one-armed man to exercise extreme excessive force.
Canaan P.
Pittsburgh, PA asks - "If you could pick your top 3 "man, it would be awesome to have that job", what would they be...and dont make it about money."
Paul: My list is simple as I have dreamed them since I was young:
1. A member of MC Hammer's posse:
sup little man? |
2. Pro Wrestling Referee:
What appeals to me is that you are instantly a part of sports history, being there up close with some of the greatest athletes on the planet, and the excitement of the crowd would just get my blood pumping. The plus side is that it seems that you don't have to be aware of anything. You can turn a blind eye to illegality, and when you get touched by anyone you can take a nice 10-15 minute nap having to recollection of anything that happened previously to that. Seems pretty easy job where you only need to count to 3, if you get confronted you fall down and turtle, and if you feel assertive you are the boss and your word is above all.
3. NHL Penalty Box Attendant: After a huge penalty, wouldn't you love just to look the guy in the eye, and tell him "you know, you fucked up". You would inevitably meet all the NHL players during your career, and the only thing you would need to do is count down from 2, 4, 5, or 10 open the door and earn a paycheck.
Ian: First, I'd like to work for the U.S. Mint. I'd get to have complete control over inflation and devaluation. Man, it would be awesome to have that job.
Second, I would like to be the Monopoly banker. Seriously, guys, I know last time, I threw the bank out the window and kicked over the board and said I hated you all because you're a bunch of cheaters, but I swear this time it'll be different. Man it would be awesome to have that job.
Third, I'd like to be MC Hammer's accountant. Talk about getting paid to do nothing! Ha! Man it would be awesome to have that job.
Clare F. Pittsburgh PA asks - "Why are YOU so persistent?"
Paul: You know I've heard that a few times in my life from different people. I think the explanation stems from a deep seeded ..... eh, I'm bored - nevermind.
Ian: I thought I had asked you not to bring that up, ever again. It's true, I used to have a problem with persistence. I think it's glanular and now that it's common knowledge, I suppose I'll reveal how I've dealt with it throughout the years:
Vanessa S. Ambler, PA asks - "what is thundersnow?"
They approached Snow with the idea to be the figurehead of the then unnamed energy drink campaign to which he replied, "Word ..." On the assumption that it meant yes, and his agent accepting the multi-million dollar endorsement from PepsiCo proceeded with the drink being branded "Thundersnow". Thundersnow the first energy drink ever introduced by a major US beverage company. It's flavor has been described as predominately fruity, with a hint of spice and a touch of the key ingredient guaraná. It was marketed as a "high-energy drink" with guaraná and caffeine. In full production and ready to ship, Thundersnow was 3 months away from launch. Pepsi Co. was ready to film a commercial with the Canadian MC. Snow was no where to be found. Director, Bob Giraldi, (who's previous claim to fame was setting Michael Jackson on fire in 1984, and ironically working on MJ's HIStory video collection) was furious! They contacted Snow, and Snow's representatives numerous times with no answer. The production was shut down that same day with the Pepsi Co. having a tough decision ahead of them.
Sending Snow's attorney a breach of contract subpoena, the deal between Pepsi and Snow was finished. The drink was later re-branded as Josta, and enjoyed mild success for a little under a decade. Snow seemed unfazed by the bad publicity thinking, he could carry himself with his music for the rest of his career. Years later during a sit down interview with Purplesky Magazine he was asked by a Japanese reporter about the deal with Pepsi and Snow. Snow called the whole situation "wack," leaving the rest for interpretation.
Paul: You know I've heard that a few times in my life from different people. I think the explanation stems from a deep seeded ..... eh, I'm bored - nevermind.
Ian: I thought I had asked you not to bring that up, ever again. It's true, I used to have a problem with persistence. I think it's glanular and now that it's common knowledge, I suppose I'll reveal how I've dealt with it throughout the years:
Vanessa S. Ambler, PA asks - "what is thundersnow?"
Paul: The year was 1993 and "Informer" was enjoying it's 7th week at #1 on the Billboard charts, and Canadian rapper Snow was cashing in hand over fist. His album, "12 Inches of Snow" was platinum in the US and triple platinum in Canada, and life was good for Snow. In early 1994 after a length tour of the US, and Canada; Snow was approached by the Pepsi corporation. Pepsi was fresh after the commercial failure of Crystal Pepsi, and they were looking for something else insane to sink their limitless money into. After years of testing and focus groups they determined that the energy drink was the going to be the future of the beverage industry.
They approached Snow with the idea to be the figurehead of the then unnamed energy drink campaign to which he replied, "Word ..." On the assumption that it meant yes, and his agent accepting the multi-million dollar endorsement from PepsiCo proceeded with the drink being branded "Thundersnow". Thundersnow the first energy drink ever introduced by a major US beverage company. It's flavor has been described as predominately fruity, with a hint of spice and a touch of the key ingredient guaraná. It was marketed as a "high-energy drink" with guaraná and caffeine. In full production and ready to ship, Thundersnow was 3 months away from launch. Pepsi Co. was ready to film a commercial with the Canadian MC. Snow was no where to be found. Director, Bob Giraldi, (who's previous claim to fame was setting Michael Jackson on fire in 1984, and ironically working on MJ's HIStory video collection) was furious! They contacted Snow, and Snow's representatives numerous times with no answer. The production was shut down that same day with the Pepsi Co. having a tough decision ahead of them.
Snow calling Pepsi "wack" |
It’s been exactly three months since the new staff first inhabited the quarters. I find the meals no longer want for flavor and fixtures in the halls and guest rooms no longer pale with dust. The whole estate now bustles with renewed vitality, bristling at all hours with the suggestion of anonymous youth. Yet while observant and polite and superior in every aspect, attending to all affairs both expected and spontaneous with less disruption, in less anticipation, and for lesser salaries, no one here remembers who you were. The gardener now only scowls peevishly when I send a tempest of gravel onto the uniformly manicured lawn, pastel and pristinely preened. I’m still unused to my pointed sighs sinking weightlessly under the undisturbed clutter of efficiency. How often I forget myself and lingering, wait on the maid’s piteously cocked glances to connect with my listless moistened eyelids that once elicited conditioned consolation. Although you never had in seven years of visitation and eventual residence the opportunity to memorize their names, I often found myself nodding automatically at Parkis the butler’s hand on my shoulder accompanying unsolicited assurances such as “We miss her dearly, sir.” I’d catch myself following the melodically intoned invocations of the maid Ms. Miles, whose face you once said aroused in you a deep discomfort, “No doubt she rests upon the right hand…” They only knew you left on unsuspicious holiday—not your first without me—to perish unexpectedly, your lithe limbs already spent and limp while being carried off the Cessna and once more tightly writhing within the second night of arrival, whipping little bits of essential sweat with every twist upon a daybed in the final minutes.
I don’t pretend that I remember who you were. Who I knew had left before your body departed the continent or your spirit relieved itself of its material. My beloved lies buried in the undisclosed circumstances of your last excursion, a secret only known to me since their infancy, including your companion, the trip’s initial impetus and requestor, who was to be my replacement. Attending beds with you in secret addresses, he intended to be so before we even wed and had convinced you to continue with the natural matrimony as to contribute comfort to the conditions. A pianist! When only news awoke us a day before your proposed homecoming, I felt instantaneous but fleeting relief. My desire for details became my new obsession, replacing and outweighing my jealous burden. At that time, I wanted to hear you scream as you tried, in a perverted reenactment of your stray straining, to resist the inevitable outcome of your escapade and force open your eyes in accusation and regret as he averted your thinning form, held so close in various escapist charades. I wanted to see your unenviable bones collapsing and scraping the inside of your skin in independent spasms, new contortions unattempted in previous recreation. Long after the waltz written employing anagrams of your name had waned in popularity and fallen out of common repertoires, I revisited my favorite phrases of yours, fine tuning them to divine which ones were your stock, which you had heard first on his lips and which were lies composed before we’d even met.
Until the very day their resignations were enforced, they misunderstood the source of my unebbing grief, assessing the root of my disbelief to be in the triumph of fatal determination and not your ill-conceived decision. They stressed that I must press on, that my indignation was misdirected expenditure, mistaking its aim for the otherworldly instead of the incomprehensible fact that a repugnant composer of stagnant, artificial overtures could overtake my passion for you. I never corrected them. I never so much as implied what I knew about the increasingly coincidental vacancies of our chamber and the music shop or the fat, flaccid fingers leading your hand to the ends of the earth as I had so often promised. They praised your singing and voracity. “Insatiable,” they’d say without a trace of irony or mockery. Your favorite meals were eventually brought to me despite foresight of a lost appetite. The broken dishes were swept away with patience and set jingling in gentle encouragement. Their sympathetic din grew louder and more harmonious against my discordant truth, asserting that your suffering was short until I’d abruptly quit the hall. The tantrums that such remarks engendered were attributed to a maladjusted mind—and correctly so—and they’d let me go, unaware the malady stemmed from all my discarded devotion, requited only for convenience. The unfairness that all but me may recall you flawlessly, ideal, supreme.
For months, I reluctantly approached father, imploring in superficial implications that the mourning chorus must go. “The tapestries spit dust when one walks by. Please say something…The flowers in the foyer have been two days wilting. Please do something,” but nothing was said and nothing done, owing to years of dedicated service and reciprocal respect. I received repeated prayers with feigned restraint until I broke under your tarnished memory. I accepted as penance the duty of silence. I suspended my frustrations. The vivid approximations of your meetings and torrid fits, the first and subsequent, and the misplaced carnal snarls that ensnared your once eloquent wit became flat fact to me, not tortuous vision. One day last summer, inside the study, father volunteered the mystifying sentiment, “As all relationships begin auspiciously, they never quite seem to reach that level of indefinite splendor we prepare for, isn’t that right…”
Today, I sifted through the newly organized cabinets, searching for a napkin you clumsily marked with lipstick on your last night here—from nervousness or blissful distraction I’m still unsure—that remained a year unwashed out of reverence—for me or for the ideal you, I’m still uncertain. It now rests, indistinguishable in the sweet smelling load of light linen which I rejected in entirety into an insolent pile on the floor. I passed the piano which now appears as if frequently played and turn up the freshly polished lid. I faintly ran the length of the keyboard and wondered which note begins your sonata. I tried reciting Ms. Miles’ prayers with the intention of including him had I been able to recall his name or the prayer itself. I’m now prepared for platitudes and presumptions, for adoptions of martyrdom, to abandon one unfounded insistence for another, but comical imitations replace the sympathetic murmurs audible outside the servants’ quarters. I find narrow empty eyes focused only on completing daily routines and vacating the corridors without encountering me. I watch two motes of dead cell dust collide and drift onto the floor, loitering until tomorrow to be dutifully disposed for offences that comprise their basic nature.
I don’t pretend that I remember who you were. Who I knew had left before your body departed the continent or your spirit relieved itself of its material. My beloved lies buried in the undisclosed circumstances of your last excursion, a secret only known to me since their infancy, including your companion, the trip’s initial impetus and requestor, who was to be my replacement. Attending beds with you in secret addresses, he intended to be so before we even wed and had convinced you to continue with the natural matrimony as to contribute comfort to the conditions. A pianist! When only news awoke us a day before your proposed homecoming, I felt instantaneous but fleeting relief. My desire for details became my new obsession, replacing and outweighing my jealous burden. At that time, I wanted to hear you scream as you tried, in a perverted reenactment of your stray straining, to resist the inevitable outcome of your escapade and force open your eyes in accusation and regret as he averted your thinning form, held so close in various escapist charades. I wanted to see your unenviable bones collapsing and scraping the inside of your skin in independent spasms, new contortions unattempted in previous recreation. Long after the waltz written employing anagrams of your name had waned in popularity and fallen out of common repertoires, I revisited my favorite phrases of yours, fine tuning them to divine which ones were your stock, which you had heard first on his lips and which were lies composed before we’d even met.
Until the very day their resignations were enforced, they misunderstood the source of my unebbing grief, assessing the root of my disbelief to be in the triumph of fatal determination and not your ill-conceived decision. They stressed that I must press on, that my indignation was misdirected expenditure, mistaking its aim for the otherworldly instead of the incomprehensible fact that a repugnant composer of stagnant, artificial overtures could overtake my passion for you. I never corrected them. I never so much as implied what I knew about the increasingly coincidental vacancies of our chamber and the music shop or the fat, flaccid fingers leading your hand to the ends of the earth as I had so often promised. They praised your singing and voracity. “Insatiable,” they’d say without a trace of irony or mockery. Your favorite meals were eventually brought to me despite foresight of a lost appetite. The broken dishes were swept away with patience and set jingling in gentle encouragement. Their sympathetic din grew louder and more harmonious against my discordant truth, asserting that your suffering was short until I’d abruptly quit the hall. The tantrums that such remarks engendered were attributed to a maladjusted mind—and correctly so—and they’d let me go, unaware the malady stemmed from all my discarded devotion, requited only for convenience. The unfairness that all but me may recall you flawlessly, ideal, supreme.
For months, I reluctantly approached father, imploring in superficial implications that the mourning chorus must go. “The tapestries spit dust when one walks by. Please say something…The flowers in the foyer have been two days wilting. Please do something,” but nothing was said and nothing done, owing to years of dedicated service and reciprocal respect. I received repeated prayers with feigned restraint until I broke under your tarnished memory. I accepted as penance the duty of silence. I suspended my frustrations. The vivid approximations of your meetings and torrid fits, the first and subsequent, and the misplaced carnal snarls that ensnared your once eloquent wit became flat fact to me, not tortuous vision. One day last summer, inside the study, father volunteered the mystifying sentiment, “As all relationships begin auspiciously, they never quite seem to reach that level of indefinite splendor we prepare for, isn’t that right…”
Today, I sifted through the newly organized cabinets, searching for a napkin you clumsily marked with lipstick on your last night here—from nervousness or blissful distraction I’m still unsure—that remained a year unwashed out of reverence—for me or for the ideal you, I’m still uncertain. It now rests, indistinguishable in the sweet smelling load of light linen which I rejected in entirety into an insolent pile on the floor. I passed the piano which now appears as if frequently played and turn up the freshly polished lid. I faintly ran the length of the keyboard and wondered which note begins your sonata. I tried reciting Ms. Miles’ prayers with the intention of including him had I been able to recall his name or the prayer itself. I’m now prepared for platitudes and presumptions, for adoptions of martyrdom, to abandon one unfounded insistence for another, but comical imitations replace the sympathetic murmurs audible outside the servants’ quarters. I find narrow empty eyes focused only on completing daily routines and vacating the corridors without encountering me. I watch two motes of dead cell dust collide and drift onto the floor, loitering until tomorrow to be dutifully disposed for offences that comprise their basic nature.
The year was 1949, and the young ingenious Rip Taylor (15) served as a page for the US Senate in Washington DC. He delivered documents, distributed The Congressional Record, helped out in the Senate chambers, and got to raise and lower the flag on the Capitol's roof. One fateful day he was delivering a now forgotten document to Sen. Harry P. Cain (R-WA) where Rip was immediately enamored back by Cain's charm and charisma. They had a brief conversation regarding the purchasing of a new television set for Sen. Cain's office and where the best place for it would be. It was then where Rip expressed his love, and fascination for the television set, mentioning how his family has not yet gotten one. Sen. Cain invited the young wide-eyed Rip back to his chambers to catch the Brooklyn Dodgers vs. New York Yankees World Series on CBS later in the week.
A platonic friendship developed between the two as the weeks passed by, as later Rip would admit, "The man's name was Harry P Cain! C'mon! I take what I can get! Brahhhh-ba-pa-pa!"
With the exceptional work ethic Rip had, and his newly found connection with Senator Cain, he found himself invited to work the Congressional Christmas dinner of 1949. He was working in the kitchen as a bus boy cleaning off the empty plates, and refilling water. It was then Senator Cain pulled him aside while clearing off his salad plate and introduced him to Sen. Joe McCarthy (R-WI) who later would become the public face of fighting Communism, during the Cold War.
Senator Cain said, "Hey, Joey this is one of our pages, (Rip). This kid is hilarious, and a hard f*cking worker! Hey, kid tell make this guy laugh, help him get the stick out of his *ss"
Rip was put on the spot with now several US Senator's looking in his direction. Seeing a baked potato left over on Senator McCarthy's plate he quickly snatched it and impaled a near-by pen into it. It loosely resembled a penis, and Rip shouted, "Look at this hot SPUD!" as he made it jitterbug across the dining room table.
The entire table erupted with laughter, as fellow page George Lerner looked on in jealousy. The senator's embraced Rip's sense of humor as he entertained them for the rest of the night lip syching to "All I Want for Christmas is my Two Front Teeth" by Spike Jones and telling bad knock knock jokes.
The summer of 1950 Rip altered his design for the potato man (which he called the hot spud), adding eyes, hands, and feet made of broken flower pots he smoothed down by grinding it against the sidewalk outside of his house. When the first prototype was almost finished Rip was conscripted to serve in the Korean War.
Rip served as a mess hall cook from 1950-1952 where he included a show after every meal. Potatoes were a main part of the soldier's diet, so he his "Hot Spud" concept was a big part of his after dinner entertainment. He modeled the main character after himself, and told complicated soap opera-like stories involving a variety of potato characters.
Rip's dinner shows became more, and more popular over the course of the war, so much in fact, several strategic missions were almost compromised due to tardiness of some troops.
When Rip's tour of duty was served he returned home to Washington DC, with a glimmer in his eye, and hope in his heart for his "Hot Spud" idea. He contacted several companies to market it. The invention was controversial due to the improper use of food (rationing was still a mind set back then) and the large ceramic penis the concept was packaged with. Rip was discouraged with the constant rejection of his idea, saying it was offensive, and inappropriate. In 1952, he recalls, gave up on "Hot Spud" and went to pursue his love for entertaining.
In the early 1960's while sitting down to watch "The Ed Sullivan Show" Rip Taylor recalls seeing this commercial for the first time.
Shocked to learn childhood friend George Lerner took his idea during that Christmas dinner in 1949, and sold it to then school supply company HASBRO for $5000.00! Rip was shocked, as he watched his dream in glorious black and white come to life, and being sold to millions of homes world wide.
He later moved on to create some of the most important innovations in human kind, later forgiving George for stealing his idea. Rip still fondly recalls his early memories for "Hot Spud" and his dream to mass produce millions of adult-themed potato toys, but since that fateful day watching TV he's never really looked back.
A platonic friendship developed between the two as the weeks passed by, as later Rip would admit, "The man's name was Harry P Cain! C'mon! I take what I can get! Brahhhh-ba-pa-pa!"
With the exceptional work ethic Rip had, and his newly found connection with Senator Cain, he found himself invited to work the Congressional Christmas dinner of 1949. He was working in the kitchen as a bus boy cleaning off the empty plates, and refilling water. It was then Senator Cain pulled him aside while clearing off his salad plate and introduced him to Sen. Joe McCarthy (R-WI) who later would become the public face of fighting Communism, during the Cold War.
That kid was f*cking funny! |
Senator Cain said, "Hey, Joey this is one of our pages, (Rip). This kid is hilarious, and a hard f*cking worker! Hey, kid tell make this guy laugh, help him get the stick out of his *ss"
Rip was put on the spot with now several US Senator's looking in his direction. Seeing a baked potato left over on Senator McCarthy's plate he quickly snatched it and impaled a near-by pen into it. It loosely resembled a penis, and Rip shouted, "Look at this hot SPUD!" as he made it jitterbug across the dining room table.
The entire table erupted with laughter, as fellow page George Lerner looked on in jealousy. The senator's embraced Rip's sense of humor as he entertained them for the rest of the night lip syching to "All I Want for Christmas is my Two Front Teeth" by Spike Jones and telling bad knock knock jokes.
The summer of 1950 Rip altered his design for the potato man (which he called the hot spud), adding eyes, hands, and feet made of broken flower pots he smoothed down by grinding it against the sidewalk outside of his house. When the first prototype was almost finished Rip was conscripted to serve in the Korean War.
Rip served as a mess hall cook from 1950-1952 where he included a show after every meal. Potatoes were a main part of the soldier's diet, so he his "Hot Spud" concept was a big part of his after dinner entertainment. He modeled the main character after himself, and told complicated soap opera-like stories involving a variety of potato characters.
early Hot Spud concept |
When Rip's tour of duty was served he returned home to Washington DC, with a glimmer in his eye, and hope in his heart for his "Hot Spud" idea. He contacted several companies to market it. The invention was controversial due to the improper use of food (rationing was still a mind set back then) and the large ceramic penis the concept was packaged with. Rip was discouraged with the constant rejection of his idea, saying it was offensive, and inappropriate. In 1952, he recalls, gave up on "Hot Spud" and went to pursue his love for entertaining.
In the early 1960's while sitting down to watch "The Ed Sullivan Show" Rip Taylor recalls seeing this commercial for the first time.
Shocked to learn childhood friend George Lerner took his idea during that Christmas dinner in 1949, and sold it to then school supply company HASBRO for $5000.00! Rip was shocked, as he watched his dream in glorious black and white come to life, and being sold to millions of homes world wide.
He later moved on to create some of the most important innovations in human kind, later forgiving George for stealing his idea. Rip still fondly recalls his early memories for "Hot Spud" and his dream to mass produce millions of adult-themed potato toys, but since that fateful day watching TV he's never really looked back.
downloads
dubstep
playlist 2011
Construx Playlist #1: Dub-Step: Sick Drops, and Harmful Bass
7:46:00 AMPaul
This video recalls the top secret process of signing birthday cards in the Clemente household. The cards themselves were bought under the utmost secrecy, and there were violently enforced rules about keeping it that way. The card signing itself was done in private, with one child at a time, as the rules about keeping it a secret were whispered into our ear making our skin crawl. Please enjoy!
Monday-Reflection
Introspective: Scripture
Tuesday-Paul Presents
Intro to Dub-step: Much Hotness
Wednesday-CXNX World Wonders
The REAL Rip Taylor #6: Rip and His Birds
Thursday-Inside Ian
Idealism v. Realism
Friday-Ask A Clemente
Lions, Bears and Time Travel
Saturday-Caturday
Talking Cats, Real and Imagined
Sunday-Unday
Warm Homey Promo
Introspective: Scripture
Tuesday-Paul Presents
Intro to Dub-step: Much Hotness
Wednesday-CXNX World Wonders
The REAL Rip Taylor #6: Rip and His Birds
Thursday-Inside Ian
Idealism v. Realism
Friday-Ask A Clemente
Lions, Bears and Time Travel
Saturday-Caturday
Talking Cats, Real and Imagined
Sunday-Unday
Warm Homey Promo
This was taken into the early hours of 2011, under the influence of dozens of alcoholic libations.
Construx Caturdays !! Thanks for stopping. I am going to focus on the rare talking cat in today's post. Please observe, and enjoy!
1. Dan B., Arnold PA.- "from the ever famous 'fight club'... "if u could fight anyone who would it be?" and why?"
Paul: I'd fight myself. I would be so happy to finally shut me the hell up, and take me down a
peg or two. I'm not sure what discipline I'd use against myself, but I know all my dirty tricks wouldn't work. I guess you all will have to tune into my Pay per View event March 6th, 2011 to see if I win.
Ian: If the question is who I could fight in the world of Fight Club, it would be this guy.
But if the question extends to anyone and why, then it'd probably be a lion...or a bear... or Ornette Coleman...
2. Vanessa S., Ambler PA Asks - "whats stronger a lion or a bear?"
Paul: I've never seen a lion do this:
3. Lisa C., Frewsburg NY- "Did you eat a lot of paint chips as a child?"
Paul: The short answer is yes. Although they were called "sleepy chips" by my parents. Looking back, we estimate we have ingested individually 7-8 ounces of paint between the ages of 3 and 8. It was primarily used as a disciplinary supplement, or a way of pacifying us if we had an abundance of energy. I personally recall the nightmares that followed a "sleepy chip" they were full of terrifying imagery that a young child can't really comprehend.
Ian: Not as many as I eat now! But if I had to give an actual figure, I'd use this.
4. Charlie D., Jamestown NY - " How does a flux capacitor work? what is the best way to generate 1.21 gigawatts of electricity without a bolt of lightning?"
Paul: Although he is a scientific mastermind, Doc Brown underestimated the power of a lightning bolt. A lightning bolt can produce up to 1 terrawatt, which could power 826.45 Time Traveling DMC-12 DeLoreans.
To answer your question more accurately though, and to debunk the Back to the Future III Time Train, the most probable way is harnessing the overall electrical output of 100,000,000 Toyota Prius' to send Doc and Marty to 1955. The Time Train that Doc rigged up to get Marty back to 1985 would have only generated 250kw, assuming he built an amazingly efficient steam electric generator. That would mean he would have needed hundreds of thousands of trains lined up longer than outside Sabrina Johnson's house. (look that joke up kids).
Ian: Essentially a flux capacitor works with a hand crank... oh wait, that's me. But a real flux capacitor only maintains a capacity for fluctuation, as the name indicates. It's not actually a "working" part of the machine, in that it doesn't produce an effect but is rather receives and processes input from other parts of the mechanical structure and other outside forces. The only function it truly serves is to keep a time machine operating on an fC to keep from appearing at random points in time (or being lost inside the time-space gap forever). It's primarily a control mechanism, eliminating as many variables as possible to the delicate venture that is temporal tampering but most theorists, such as Dr. William S. Preston, Esq. or Ornette Coleman, maintain that the fC is not only an inessential component, but detrimental to smooth travel, as its sensitivity and unpredictability interferes. If you ask most, they'll say magic. Basically, a flux capacitor doesn't work. Here's one final theory...
5. Allison C., Sewickly PA- "What kind of questions are you looking for?"
Paul: I'm not a superficial man, very happily married, but something like this I wouldn't mind.
Ian: My ideal question would like long walks through alleyways at sundown, long quiet nights listening to Ornette Coleman, gorilla masks, candlelit restaurants, looking at maps and saying "Ooh! I'd like to go there someday." My ideal question is misleading, deceitful and self-serving, if you catch my drift. My ideal question prefers impoverishment...wait, is this a MadLib???
Paul: I'd fight myself. I would be so happy to finally shut me the hell up, and take me down a
peg or two. I'm not sure what discipline I'd use against myself, but I know all my dirty tricks wouldn't work. I guess you all will have to tune into my Pay per View event March 6th, 2011 to see if I win.
Ian: If the question is who I could fight in the world of Fight Club, it would be this guy.
But if the question extends to anyone and why, then it'd probably be a lion...or a bear... or Ornette Coleman...
2. Vanessa S., Ambler PA Asks - "whats stronger a lion or a bear?"
Paul: I've never seen a lion do this:
Ian: Ornette Coleman is stronger than a lion or a bear... or not...But that which doesn't kill you...
3. Lisa C., Frewsburg NY- "Did you eat a lot of paint chips as a child?"
Paul: The short answer is yes. Although they were called "sleepy chips" by my parents. Looking back, we estimate we have ingested individually 7-8 ounces of paint between the ages of 3 and 8. It was primarily used as a disciplinary supplement, or a way of pacifying us if we had an abundance of energy. I personally recall the nightmares that followed a "sleepy chip" they were full of terrifying imagery that a young child can't really comprehend.
Ian: Not as many as I eat now! But if I had to give an actual figure, I'd use this.
4. Charlie D., Jamestown NY - " How does a flux capacitor work? what is the best way to generate 1.21 gigawatts of electricity without a bolt of lightning?"
Paul: Although he is a scientific mastermind, Doc Brown underestimated the power of a lightning bolt. A lightning bolt can produce up to 1 terrawatt, which could power 826.45 Time Traveling DMC-12 DeLoreans.
To answer your question more accurately though, and to debunk the Back to the Future III Time Train, the most probable way is harnessing the overall electrical output of 100,000,000 Toyota Prius' to send Doc and Marty to 1955. The Time Train that Doc rigged up to get Marty back to 1985 would have only generated 250kw, assuming he built an amazingly efficient steam electric generator. That would mean he would have needed hundreds of thousands of trains lined up longer than outside Sabrina Johnson's house. (look that joke up kids).
Ian: Essentially a flux capacitor works with a hand crank... oh wait, that's me. But a real flux capacitor only maintains a capacity for fluctuation, as the name indicates. It's not actually a "working" part of the machine, in that it doesn't produce an effect but is rather receives and processes input from other parts of the mechanical structure and other outside forces. The only function it truly serves is to keep a time machine operating on an fC to keep from appearing at random points in time (or being lost inside the time-space gap forever). It's primarily a control mechanism, eliminating as many variables as possible to the delicate venture that is temporal tampering but most theorists, such as Dr. William S. Preston, Esq. or Ornette Coleman, maintain that the fC is not only an inessential component, but detrimental to smooth travel, as its sensitivity and unpredictability interferes. If you ask most, they'll say magic. Basically, a flux capacitor doesn't work. Here's one final theory...
5. Allison C., Sewickly PA- "What kind of questions are you looking for?"
Paul: I'm not a superficial man, very happily married, but something like this I wouldn't mind.
Ian: My ideal question would like long walks through alleyways at sundown, long quiet nights listening to Ornette Coleman, gorilla masks, candlelit restaurants, looking at maps and saying "Ooh! I'd like to go there someday." My ideal question is misleading, deceitful and self-serving, if you catch my drift. My ideal question prefers impoverishment...wait, is this a MadLib???
One of the most stubborn impediments to individual (and cultural) progress is the unwillingness of many to pursue idealism. I believe this stems from an initial misconception and systematic reinforcement of that misunderstanding. The concept of the ideal is never addressed clearly and therefore ideals are not composed to their full potential, denying them the elasticity and longevity to maintain a loving, persistent pursuit. As realism imposes comparative restraints on not only idealism, but enactment, a fairly arbitrary lineage of superiority has come to prominence that benefits from reassurance that the only acceptable conception of success is fulfillment of realistic expectations as opposed to ideal situations.
Perhaps, for clarity's sake, we should differentiate idealism and realism. I hope we can all agree they compose a strict dichotomy (as the flimsy architecture of the following depends on it). Less accepted is the obvious fact that they are absolutely mutually exclusive. A commonly accepted chronology is that ideals are first conceived or, to be fair, (mis)perceived then tailored to existing conditions as a prerequisite for implementation. This is the point of restriction of the ideal, where it becomes an idea. To further avoid definition by negation, We may agree that an ideal is an internal, whole, independent conception without consideration for externally existing conditions. It is internal in it's creation within an individual's mind, as opposed to the product of prior influence or conglomorated compormise. It is whole in its acknowledgement of the immutable goal as well as every step and element necessary for its completion. These steps and elements should be attainable by the individual to conceive. It is independent in its irrelevance of external effects.
What often occurs is that an ideal is conceived and then conceded quickly to confinements. These confinements are addressed formally as Reality or the Real World and almost invariably awarded dominance in the conscious sphere. Therefore, ideals are quickly altered, truncated and the goal of any ideal, the tail end, is mutilated or mutated. The ideal becomes an idea. The idea is the grey area through which all idealism must pass in hopes of acheivement. To positively identify Reality, we may agree that it is external, inconstant and reliant. It is external in that it exists outside of the conceiver, either partially or completely. It is inconstant in that it never takes a permanent form. It is reliant in that so many factors need to coincide for a particular reality to exist.
Most of us have ideas, plans or notions because we abandon the ideal tail for the sake of ease, in compliance with the real. One begins to make conditional statements to allow for
To only make matters more confusing, a presented reality is often lifted to the level of the ideal. For me, the most immediate example is the idealization of another human being, often times a living one, where the external, inconstant and reliant qualities are stripped away as to invent or preserve (or pervert) an appearance of perfection. There is simply no way to revert or repeal imperfections. What is pejoratively referred to as Idealization is the application of the ideal in place of the real. The two cannot co-exist, so there is no conflagration of the two. It is mere substitution, often employed in attempts of ideal pursuit.
Of course, another excellent example is the ethos of most political parties and religions which begin with the physical world we inhabit and retroactively apply a vague concept of idealism over it. Most literature, whether blaming others in one case or explaining away in the other, promotes an ideal as distant, yet indistinct goal, full of covenants and caveats.
The result is invariably replacement or settling. Replacement occurs when a component or the actual preconceived goal of an ideal is altered in concession to preexisting terms, therefore ceasing to be an ideal. Settling is the result of external forces such as friction and resistance cause a complete loss of momentum at whatever step towards an ideal at which an individual stands. Abandonment is a form of settling, the most extreme form.
Memorable coinage has long attempted to dissuade Many advise that one "Hope for the best, prepare for the worst." Many also defend defeatist views as "I'm not a Pessimist, I'm a Realist." I suppose my reaction to such pitiful passivity is the impetus for this entire discussion. I see no reason to purposely limit oneself and pursue a world created by other forces and whims, to submit before even attempting to establish one's idea. I assume that many share the most hypocritically hidden motivation of ease. As diametric and dialectic opposites, idealism and realism are inevitably bound to cause resistance and for many, this is too exhausting to tolerate. Hope is a passive reimagining of relinquished responsibility. Equal attention and preparation should be allotted to the ideal (not just the best, another flexible term bowing to some imagined superiority of the real)> Pessimists are perpetrators of acts directed against ideals, one who specifically and knowingly creates obstacles for others or themselves. Realists are those who passively accept pessimistic limitations and attempt to co-exist between the ideal and the pessismistic
Maybe the many are right that the completely inorganic, ethereal substance that composes the ideal cannot exist in what we call the real, organic world. In fact, in last week's discussion, I myself posited the gap between the internal ideal and its lack of its practical application in a world of action. Does this mean reality is a limitation? Is the sole and uncontested conclusion the withering of an ideal conception in its passage to the material world? Is it mere delusion in face of impossibility and impassibility to fashion an ideal into a tangibility?
To remain an ideal in action, the goal must be rigid and unwavering, with each step towards the conclusion set firmly in anticipation of its execution. Then every event, which is the immediate, fleeting moment of impact between the ideal and the real, must be categorized. It either is an ideal condition that promotes or facilitates the long established goal and is embraced and fostered, or it is a product of reality, an inhibitor and is to be disregarded. Is this to say that such factors as gravity and death, which impose immediate and seemingly permanent resistance to some ideals are only a product of a pessimistic mind? Am I about to preach that the only reason such obstacles exist is that we allow or create them? No. That is blind foolishness, it's observable that even animals with absolutely disregard, or perhaps (and I'll only allow it this once) ignorance, concerning these very conceptions fall prey to them. But such realities have proven to be impermanent. Unforseen factors can alter such seeming certainties. Reality is the most impermanent force in the universe. It is inconstant. This includes the intimidating tyrannies of death and physical laws. They will change, and have. What's important is that an ideal remain steadfast and vitally intertwined into an everyday interaction within, under and against these realities.
Each step of an ideal goal is in itself a smaller ideal and must be obstinately supported until realism falls prey to its ephemerality. While the tail may shorten or flicker, it's of the utmost important not allow it to be chopped off in concession. The key to maintaining this method of relentless pushing is to conceive the ideal (the small step or final goal) before enacting it. The whole ideal must precede the action and must be conceived independent of existing forces, as suggested above. As long as the initial conception remains unyeilding, the ideal will not pass through that dulling gray plasma of idea.
In certain fields of practice, such as the empirical sciences and passenger transportation, the phrase "ideal conditions" is employed. These conditions may be artificial as in the first instance or fleeting as in the second, but existent nonetheless. At first, this may apprear contradictory but in fact it's very useful. Ideal conditions exist when the real yields, when the uncompromised preconceptions of the ideal are met without resistence or coercion. This is the sublimation of the ideal. It is the application of the sublime to the ideal. While this concept appears in the physical world, albeit as a rarity, the transition is that of solid to gas whereas in the mental world, the sublime effect occurs in reverse. As pessimists are an extreme and active companion to realists, the sublime is the superlative relative of the ideal. It is superior to the real, superseding it and actively altering it. As with physical phenomena, it's a rarity but an actuality.
Unfortunately, by definition, idealism is a stalemate. Two ideals will not necessarily coincide. At best, two end goals are serendipitously similar, encountering each other after their conception. At worst, two ideals are completely contradictory and become each other's realities. As an ideal's conception cannot be compromised without ceasing to exist as an ideal, then the idea of a unified goal is nearly impossible, barring a sublime collectively independent focus in the Mayan style. In the meantime, let's hope for the best...
Perhaps, for clarity's sake, we should differentiate idealism and realism. I hope we can all agree they compose a strict dichotomy (as the flimsy architecture of the following depends on it). Less accepted is the obvious fact that they are absolutely mutually exclusive. A commonly accepted chronology is that ideals are first conceived or, to be fair, (mis)perceived then tailored to existing conditions as a prerequisite for implementation. This is the point of restriction of the ideal, where it becomes an idea. To further avoid definition by negation, We may agree that an ideal is an internal, whole, independent conception without consideration for externally existing conditions. It is internal in it's creation within an individual's mind, as opposed to the product of prior influence or conglomorated compormise. It is whole in its acknowledgement of the immutable goal as well as every step and element necessary for its completion. These steps and elements should be attainable by the individual to conceive. It is independent in its irrelevance of external effects.
What often occurs is that an ideal is conceived and then conceded quickly to confinements. These confinements are addressed formally as Reality or the Real World and almost invariably awarded dominance in the conscious sphere. Therefore, ideals are quickly altered, truncated and the goal of any ideal, the tail end, is mutilated or mutated. The ideal becomes an idea. The idea is the grey area through which all idealism must pass in hopes of acheivement. To positively identify Reality, we may agree that it is external, inconstant and reliant. It is external in that it exists outside of the conceiver, either partially or completely. It is inconstant in that it never takes a permanent form. It is reliant in that so many factors need to coincide for a particular reality to exist.
Most of us have ideas, plans or notions because we abandon the ideal tail for the sake of ease, in compliance with the real. One begins to make conditional statements to allow for
To only make matters more confusing, a presented reality is often lifted to the level of the ideal. For me, the most immediate example is the idealization of another human being, often times a living one, where the external, inconstant and reliant qualities are stripped away as to invent or preserve (or pervert) an appearance of perfection. There is simply no way to revert or repeal imperfections. What is pejoratively referred to as Idealization is the application of the ideal in place of the real. The two cannot co-exist, so there is no conflagration of the two. It is mere substitution, often employed in attempts of ideal pursuit.
Of course, another excellent example is the ethos of most political parties and religions which begin with the physical world we inhabit and retroactively apply a vague concept of idealism over it. Most literature, whether blaming others in one case or explaining away in the other, promotes an ideal as distant, yet indistinct goal, full of covenants and caveats.
The result is invariably replacement or settling. Replacement occurs when a component or the actual preconceived goal of an ideal is altered in concession to preexisting terms, therefore ceasing to be an ideal. Settling is the result of external forces such as friction and resistance cause a complete loss of momentum at whatever step towards an ideal at which an individual stands. Abandonment is a form of settling, the most extreme form.
Memorable coinage has long attempted to dissuade Many advise that one "Hope for the best, prepare for the worst." Many also defend defeatist views as "I'm not a Pessimist, I'm a Realist." I suppose my reaction to such pitiful passivity is the impetus for this entire discussion. I see no reason to purposely limit oneself and pursue a world created by other forces and whims, to submit before even attempting to establish one's idea. I assume that many share the most hypocritically hidden motivation of ease. As diametric and dialectic opposites, idealism and realism are inevitably bound to cause resistance and for many, this is too exhausting to tolerate. Hope is a passive reimagining of relinquished responsibility. Equal attention and preparation should be allotted to the ideal (not just the best, another flexible term bowing to some imagined superiority of the real)> Pessimists are perpetrators of acts directed against ideals, one who specifically and knowingly creates obstacles for others or themselves. Realists are those who passively accept pessimistic limitations and attempt to co-exist between the ideal and the pessismistic
Maybe the many are right that the completely inorganic, ethereal substance that composes the ideal cannot exist in what we call the real, organic world. In fact, in last week's discussion, I myself posited the gap between the internal ideal and its lack of its practical application in a world of action. Does this mean reality is a limitation? Is the sole and uncontested conclusion the withering of an ideal conception in its passage to the material world? Is it mere delusion in face of impossibility and impassibility to fashion an ideal into a tangibility?
To remain an ideal in action, the goal must be rigid and unwavering, with each step towards the conclusion set firmly in anticipation of its execution. Then every event, which is the immediate, fleeting moment of impact between the ideal and the real, must be categorized. It either is an ideal condition that promotes or facilitates the long established goal and is embraced and fostered, or it is a product of reality, an inhibitor and is to be disregarded. Is this to say that such factors as gravity and death, which impose immediate and seemingly permanent resistance to some ideals are only a product of a pessimistic mind? Am I about to preach that the only reason such obstacles exist is that we allow or create them? No. That is blind foolishness, it's observable that even animals with absolutely disregard, or perhaps (and I'll only allow it this once) ignorance, concerning these very conceptions fall prey to them. But such realities have proven to be impermanent. Unforseen factors can alter such seeming certainties. Reality is the most impermanent force in the universe. It is inconstant. This includes the intimidating tyrannies of death and physical laws. They will change, and have. What's important is that an ideal remain steadfast and vitally intertwined into an everyday interaction within, under and against these realities.
Each step of an ideal goal is in itself a smaller ideal and must be obstinately supported until realism falls prey to its ephemerality. While the tail may shorten or flicker, it's of the utmost important not allow it to be chopped off in concession. The key to maintaining this method of relentless pushing is to conceive the ideal (the small step or final goal) before enacting it. The whole ideal must precede the action and must be conceived independent of existing forces, as suggested above. As long as the initial conception remains unyeilding, the ideal will not pass through that dulling gray plasma of idea.
In certain fields of practice, such as the empirical sciences and passenger transportation, the phrase "ideal conditions" is employed. These conditions may be artificial as in the first instance or fleeting as in the second, but existent nonetheless. At first, this may apprear contradictory but in fact it's very useful. Ideal conditions exist when the real yields, when the uncompromised preconceptions of the ideal are met without resistence or coercion. This is the sublimation of the ideal. It is the application of the sublime to the ideal. While this concept appears in the physical world, albeit as a rarity, the transition is that of solid to gas whereas in the mental world, the sublime effect occurs in reverse. As pessimists are an extreme and active companion to realists, the sublime is the superlative relative of the ideal. It is superior to the real, superseding it and actively altering it. As with physical phenomena, it's a rarity but an actuality.
Unfortunately, by definition, idealism is a stalemate. Two ideals will not necessarily coincide. At best, two end goals are serendipitously similar, encountering each other after their conception. At worst, two ideals are completely contradictory and become each other's realities. As an ideal's conception cannot be compromised without ceasing to exist as an ideal, then the idea of a unified goal is nearly impossible, barring a sublime collectively independent focus in the Mayan style. In the meantime, let's hope for the best...
There's been much confusion and controversy surrounding the selection of Rip Taylor for a fetured role in 2010's arthouse film The Black Swan, but the choice was fairly obvious, given Rip's longstanding fascination with birds. [ed. note: For those of you who may haven't seen the movie, Rip plays Johann von Meisser, inventor of a pill that turns people into sunbeams. On a trial run, he is intercepted by a bird in the sky and the two tumble back to earth. The only way for the doctor, an environmentalist by trade, to keep the bird alive is by remaining attached and not extracing the intermingled DNA. As you can imagine, comedy ensues for the next hour or so. (Sorry to get so involved, there, but the story was absolutely riveting for me.)]
One of Rip's most unique stunts, though by far not his most impressive, is the first he teaches every tropical variety that he acquires: fetching his toupee's. During his more hedonistic and substance-fueled days, he often would turn larger species into viscious killers. To train them, he would go into the streets and toss his toupee at a completely unsuspecting pedestrian, yelling, "Catch!" which doubled as his attack command (see left, Rip, with his third wife, in New York in the mid 70's demonstrating the terrifying powers he possesses.). He later honed this skill so that his birds would specifically attack the crotch.
As you can see here, Rip's passion for winged wildlife has always aroused disbelief. Many hold hard and fast to the misconception that Rip is merely a first rate entertainer and world-renowned lover. The facts are quite to the contrary, though. Rip's first passion was always birds. This stems from an incident during time spent as a young child in Yugoslavia. Rip tended to his grandmothers bifocaled finches (Fringilla presbyopas), feeding them regularly several times a day. This is where he actually began developing his patented confetti-flinging technique. Rip would often open his show in the early days with a recreation of his feeding routine, while delivering an opening monologue from his first screenplay. He originally used birdseed, but this proved messy and occasionally fatal. he then switched to confetti, and began to make references to "spreading his seed."
Rip's narrowly known skills in communication were investigated by several scientific journals of the 1920's. Few reports survive, because few scientists did. Eventually though, the entertainment industry commanded most of Rip's attention, much to the dismay of several scientific institutions continuing attempts to harness what seemed like whimsical displays of prowess in communication. Rip's response was simply, "Hey, a gull's gotta eat!"
One of Rip's most unique stunts, though by far not his most impressive, is the first he teaches every tropical variety that he acquires: fetching his toupee's. During his more hedonistic and substance-fueled days, he often would turn larger species into viscious killers. To train them, he would go into the streets and toss his toupee at a completely unsuspecting pedestrian, yelling, "Catch!" which doubled as his attack command (see left, Rip, with his third wife, in New York in the mid 70's demonstrating the terrifying powers he possesses.). He later honed this skill so that his birds would specifically attack the crotch.
After attaining the stardom that came naturally, Rip was eventually to refocus his efforts to his first love and even combine his two careers, noting "Hey, I don't wanna pigeonholed... or maybe I do [bats eyebrows]." In the late 80's, Rip established a factory, employing a large percentage of the bird population in creating confetti from large mined blocks of plastic (below, a new employ sets about his task).
Rip has received several prestigious awards , and been dubbed in national press as "the Godfeather" and the self-appointed "Birdman of Alka-Seltzer". As if publishing several pseudonymous books weren't enough, Rip also ghostwrote several hit pop tunes in the past decade, based on conversations he had with his grandmother's finches. This is of course, only a glimpse into the frightening and awe-inspiring world of Rip's unknown talents. When asked about his lifelong interest, Rip quipped, "Well, you know, I've always been an Odd Bird!! Bwhaa meh mwah ha ha!"
Dub-step kids. Dub motherf*cking Step. It's comin' in yo' house snatchin' yo' people up, so hide yo' kids, hide yo' wives, hide yo' husbands cause it will be influencing popular music in 2011, no joke.
Wiki defines Dub-step as: a genre of electronic dance music that originated in South East London. Its overall sound has been described as "tightly coiled productions with overwhelming bass lines and reverberant drum patterns, clipped samples, and occasional vocals"
I love the face punching bass of Dub-step, the signature wa-wa-wa-wa-wa-w-w-w-w-wa, and the over the top production of most of the songs. Being a fan or drum n bass in the early 2000's this seems like the natural evolution of the genre. The beats got faster, the bass got heavier, and the songs become a lot less predictable that drum n bass' roots to house music.The best Dub-step songs damage your car's stereo, and make your head bounce filling your body with energy.
My first exposure to "official" Dub-step was Emalkay's "When I Look at You" ,and Burial's "Archangel" then I never looked back. How you can't at least nod your head along would lead me to believe that you are a robot, or old person.
Don't hate ... DubStep is solid! |
Widely concidered the most well known Dub-step DJ is Skream. He has put out 2 full albums, and 10 Ep's ever since the age of 15. The other big players are Rusko, Bassnectar, Flying Lotus, Skrillex, Chase & Status, and Plastician (formerly Plastic Man).
Also if you want free streaming Dub-step go to dupstep.fm and you can check out live DJ sets, and if you like them how bout droppin them a dime or two.
I don't think I can properly explain an entire musical genre to anyone, one its boring, two I'm not a good writer, but I hope this is a toe in the doorstep to something you may have not checked out previous to reading this. I've mentioned before, my opinions on music are not for everyone, but I never turn my nose to anything if it's suggested to me. Keep an ear to the ground and I guarantee you that in 2011 you WILL hear Dub-step somewhere other than from the inside of my car.
Put this in your face!
Last fall, we made use of a Father's Day gift for Paul, intending it primarily as a bit of a time capsule for his children as was the marketed intention. Instead of the charming stories of memorable events from our lives, this "Introspective" series of questions gets more at how we perceive our childhood and who we are now. We hope it proves to be as thought provoking for you...
Monday-Reflection
Nostalgia: W-O-R-K
Tuesday-Paul Presents
Movie Review: 127 Hours
Wednesday-CXNX World Wonders
The REAL Rip Taylor #5: The Inventor of the Paintball Gun
Thursday-Inside Ian
Thinking v. Action, Part 1
Thinking v. Action, Part 2
Friday-Ask A Clemente
Tattoos, Relations, and More
Saturday-Caturday
Haturday,Spaturday, Play 'Em Off
Sunday-Unday
Mildly Threatening Promo
Nostalgia: W-O-R-K
Tuesday-Paul Presents
Movie Review: 127 Hours
Wednesday-CXNX World Wonders
The REAL Rip Taylor #5: The Inventor of the Paintball Gun
Thursday-Inside Ian
Thinking v. Action, Part 1
Thinking v. Action, Part 2
Friday-Ask A Clemente
Tattoos, Relations, and More
Saturday-Caturday
Haturday,Spaturday, Play 'Em Off
Sunday-Unday
Mildly Threatening Promo
Ian and I left Sunday open for whatever on Construx so we are posting one of a series of commercials we did for the website after some very heavy drinking on New Year's Eve. I am going to start with the funniest one, which so happens we were the most intoxicated when we made this. Enjoy, and leave feedback if you want.
At Construx we make no excuses for our unyielding love for cats. I own 5, and Ian owns 2. Cats are awesome, it's a scientific fact. Saturday's at Construx are dedicated to cats, and for the foreseeable future will always be.
Enjoy some cats y'all!
Enjoy some cats y'all!
Here is a section where he let the "chux chasers" ask us some questions in hopes we connect on a more intimate level beyond the computer screen.
1. Erin H. - McKeesport PA. ~ what is the story behind your tattoo(s)?
Paul: What a great question! I like it because I can satisfy my need to vanity, and ego. I will go in order chronologically. All of my tattoos were done at: Almighty Studios in Jamestown NY. Not to fanboy, but they are incredible there, the art, atmosphere, and attitude there is like nothing you are used to from a tattoo shop.
This is my first ever tattoo. Its Kanji for Serenity. Simple and to the point. Who doesn't want serenity?
My second tattoo is a pictorial of APerfect Circle's "Mer de Noms" album (french for sea of names). What I interpret sea of names to be is that all the people you meet in your life, may drift away, but they are always there. The runes are a cryptogram created by Billy Howerdel and Maynard James Keenan.
This was a 6 parter. The eye was first. It's the "third eye" from Tool's album "Aenima". Secondly was the ring around the third eye from Tool's album "Lateralus". Thirdly, is the hand with the flaming eye from "Lateralus" again. It took 3 visits to do the hand for all the vein detail. I've had it for 5 years now, and I still catch myself looking at it. Lastly, is the blue lightning from the top another little piece from "Lateralus" album work. The original design for the Third Eye is Chet Zar. The whole Lateralus art is from Alex Grey.
.
My wife's initials, but her maiden name E.L; Elizabeth Lender.
My wife's intiials in the APC Runes from the earlier tattoo. I just loved the font so much, and I wouldn't imagine that too many people have it.
This is the Buddhist Aspiration Prayer written in Tibetan. I consider myself Buddhist amongst all the religions I know. It seems to bring me a depth to my spirituality, and some balance.
It's translated as:
"May all beings, equal to the sky,
have happiness and the causes of happiness;
May all beings be free from suffering
and the causes of suffering;
May all beings never be separated from the great
happiness which is beyond all suffering;
May all beings dwell in kindness free
from desire and hatred for those near and far."
This was drawn by Stephen Slesinski artist for my favorite Penguins (and possibly of all the internet) website The Pensblog. I am a HUGE Penguins fan. I watch every game I can (and pay 169 bucks for the privilege) and have followed them since 1991. I wanted to get something undeniably Penguins, but not the typical logo. I picked this guy who is called "Dicky Roberts" to forever rep the black and vegas gold on me forever.
Ian: How am I gonna follow this act?! I'm not one for answering this question, ever, much less seriously. Maybe it's because my tats and answers could never equal the passion displayed above, but I guarantee these impossibly silly reasons for the ink are true. This is my first tattoo, about a year old. It's a parallelogram. I think about 8 years ago, I was sitting in this attic, with a few people, not drinking. At that time, I was still considered a charming and exotic sort, behaviorally at least. Someone--I remember it being a guy, but I don't think there were any other guys present--asked what kind of tattoo I would get. I responded flippantly, "A parallelogram," which earned a chuckle. It was my goal to permanently add a mark to my body without any emotional attachment to it at all; how clever and ironic! Well, time passed and for all my impulses and indulgences, a tattoo never materialized. Last year, as part of a charity Tattooing event, Tree House promoted Tats for Cats, a perfect opportunity to finally take advantage of this silly, deconstructive idea. I went to Insight Studios with my friend Kris who flew in from Pittsburgh specifically to get drawn on alongside me. As I drew the design for the tat, the true idea came to light, one of Pythagorean perfection. The dimensions are in perfect proportion--the length is exactly twice the width and the obtuse angles twice the acute etc. I started to think about the idea of perfection. It was attainable and striking on paper, but on my flabby arm, it loses its impact. A good reminder. Though the picture is weak city, the angles are diagrammed in dark blue and the lines in red.
Here's my only other tattoo, also created by the clean and tidy folks at Insight. It's almost a year old, done for another charity even that a different shelter was promoting. I feel my simple designs don't do their craft justice, but this one actually has some influence behind it and represents a subculture I identify with. The story behind this bullseye is the book Please Kill Me which I read as a senior in high school and presented in Mr. Williams' Oral History class. Story goes that Richard Hell drew a crude target on a tshirt with the words "PLEASE KILL ME" under it, or around it. I've always loved that idea, as I do any antagonistic display that forces your demographic or any bystanders into an actual reaction. Apparently, Hell fashioned this statement while still with Television, one of my alltime favorite bands, and before Tom Verlaine ordered him to "Quit jumping around like an idiot" causing Hell to quit and form the Voidoids. So this is my own target, both challenging and accusing the outside world to shoot me in the back. The inker at Insight had to be cajoled into committing this to my upper back because in his words, "It will never be a perfect, symmetrical circle on that part of your body." I doubt I'll find someone who I can convince to add a third ring.
2. Wes M. - Culpepper, VA ~"Are you related to Roberto [Clemente]?"
Paul: I'm not, but I wish he was my dad - I'd sing him a song!
Ian: I wish I had access to a photo of Robert "Popop" Clemente sitting with Roberto in old Three Rivers handing him a novelty sized baseball bat emblazoned with the old Koppers logo to commemorate the opening of the stadium. Apparently Koppers was heavily involved in the construction of the stadium and it made a good photo op. Since leaving Pittsburgh, I can no longer rely on being asked the above question on a daily basis. I'm certainly not embarrassed to share my last name with such a class act. In all seriousness, I'm sure you're all aware of the man's great humanitarian leanings. He was a well-spoken, well-mannered and well-liked individual; incidentally, all qualities shared by Popop Clemente. Pardon the sentimentality, but it's sincere. The article might be available on microfiche...
3. Kelly S.-Lakewood NY ~ why, as men get older, does the hair stop growing on their heads but continue growing on the ears??
Paul: Theories vary but, scientists have come to a vague conclusion that men's ear hair directly correlates to the idea that human's have always been designed to hunt like bats. The echolocation we have not been blessed with (yet) would utilize the ear hair as a receptor that reflects off our pray.
Ian: Men's ears are on their heads.
4. Phil B. - Castle Shannon, PA ~ what?
Paul: Oh, sorry I didn't know you were on the phone.
Ian: I'll break your arm...
5. Jared A.- Lakewood NY ~can I slap you if you a wearing a banana costume?
Paul: Yes, you may. It would be assumed if I was near you in a banana costume, trouble is inevitable anyways.
Ian: A slap on the back maybe for inventing the banana costume, which as far as you know, I did. (Or slap me with a lawsuit if you're the guy who actually invented the banana costume [loosens collar]...
1. Erin H. - McKeesport PA. ~ what is the story behind your tattoo(s)?
Paul: What a great question! I like it because I can satisfy my need to vanity, and ego. I will go in order chronologically. All of my tattoos were done at: Almighty Studios in Jamestown NY. Not to fanboy, but they are incredible there, the art, atmosphere, and attitude there is like nothing you are used to from a tattoo shop.
This is my first ever tattoo. Its Kanji for Serenity. Simple and to the point. Who doesn't want serenity?
My second tattoo is a pictorial of APerfect Circle's "Mer de Noms" album (french for sea of names). What I interpret sea of names to be is that all the people you meet in your life, may drift away, but they are always there. The runes are a cryptogram created by Billy Howerdel and Maynard James Keenan.
This was a 6 parter. The eye was first. It's the "third eye" from Tool's album "Aenima". Secondly was the ring around the third eye from Tool's album "Lateralus". Thirdly, is the hand with the flaming eye from "Lateralus" again. It took 3 visits to do the hand for all the vein detail. I've had it for 5 years now, and I still catch myself looking at it. Lastly, is the blue lightning from the top another little piece from "Lateralus" album work. The original design for the Third Eye is Chet Zar. The whole Lateralus art is from Alex Grey.
.
My wife's initials, but her maiden name E.L; Elizabeth Lender.
My wife's intiials in the APC Runes from the earlier tattoo. I just loved the font so much, and I wouldn't imagine that too many people have it.
This is the Buddhist Aspiration Prayer written in Tibetan. I consider myself Buddhist amongst all the religions I know. It seems to bring me a depth to my spirituality, and some balance.
It's translated as:
"May all beings, equal to the sky,
have happiness and the causes of happiness;
May all beings be free from suffering
and the causes of suffering;
May all beings never be separated from the great
happiness which is beyond all suffering;
May all beings dwell in kindness free
from desire and hatred for those near and far."
This was drawn by Stephen Slesinski artist for my favorite Penguins (and possibly of all the internet) website The Pensblog. I am a HUGE Penguins fan. I watch every game I can (and pay 169 bucks for the privilege) and have followed them since 1991. I wanted to get something undeniably Penguins, but not the typical logo. I picked this guy who is called "Dicky Roberts" to forever rep the black and vegas gold on me forever.
Ian: How am I gonna follow this act?! I'm not one for answering this question, ever, much less seriously. Maybe it's because my tats and answers could never equal the passion displayed above, but I guarantee these impossibly silly reasons for the ink are true. This is my first tattoo, about a year old. It's a parallelogram. I think about 8 years ago, I was sitting in this attic, with a few people, not drinking. At that time, I was still considered a charming and exotic sort, behaviorally at least. Someone--I remember it being a guy, but I don't think there were any other guys present--asked what kind of tattoo I would get. I responded flippantly, "A parallelogram," which earned a chuckle. It was my goal to permanently add a mark to my body without any emotional attachment to it at all; how clever and ironic! Well, time passed and for all my impulses and indulgences, a tattoo never materialized. Last year, as part of a charity Tattooing event, Tree House promoted Tats for Cats, a perfect opportunity to finally take advantage of this silly, deconstructive idea. I went to Insight Studios with my friend Kris who flew in from Pittsburgh specifically to get drawn on alongside me. As I drew the design for the tat, the true idea came to light, one of Pythagorean perfection. The dimensions are in perfect proportion--the length is exactly twice the width and the obtuse angles twice the acute etc. I started to think about the idea of perfection. It was attainable and striking on paper, but on my flabby arm, it loses its impact. A good reminder. Though the picture is weak city, the angles are diagrammed in dark blue and the lines in red.
Here's my only other tattoo, also created by the clean and tidy folks at Insight. It's almost a year old, done for another charity even that a different shelter was promoting. I feel my simple designs don't do their craft justice, but this one actually has some influence behind it and represents a subculture I identify with. The story behind this bullseye is the book Please Kill Me which I read as a senior in high school and presented in Mr. Williams' Oral History class. Story goes that Richard Hell drew a crude target on a tshirt with the words "PLEASE KILL ME" under it, or around it. I've always loved that idea, as I do any antagonistic display that forces your demographic or any bystanders into an actual reaction. Apparently, Hell fashioned this statement while still with Television, one of my alltime favorite bands, and before Tom Verlaine ordered him to "Quit jumping around like an idiot" causing Hell to quit and form the Voidoids. So this is my own target, both challenging and accusing the outside world to shoot me in the back. The inker at Insight had to be cajoled into committing this to my upper back because in his words, "It will never be a perfect, symmetrical circle on that part of your body." I doubt I'll find someone who I can convince to add a third ring.
2. Wes M. - Culpepper, VA ~"Are you related to Roberto [Clemente]?"
Paul: I'm not, but I wish he was my dad - I'd sing him a song!
Ian: I wish I had access to a photo of Robert "Popop" Clemente sitting with Roberto in old Three Rivers handing him a novelty sized baseball bat emblazoned with the old Koppers logo to commemorate the opening of the stadium. Apparently Koppers was heavily involved in the construction of the stadium and it made a good photo op. Since leaving Pittsburgh, I can no longer rely on being asked the above question on a daily basis. I'm certainly not embarrassed to share my last name with such a class act. In all seriousness, I'm sure you're all aware of the man's great humanitarian leanings. He was a well-spoken, well-mannered and well-liked individual; incidentally, all qualities shared by Popop Clemente. Pardon the sentimentality, but it's sincere. The article might be available on microfiche...
3. Kelly S.-Lakewood NY ~ why, as men get older, does the hair stop growing on their heads but continue growing on the ears??
Paul: Theories vary but, scientists have come to a vague conclusion that men's ear hair directly correlates to the idea that human's have always been designed to hunt like bats. The echolocation we have not been blessed with (yet) would utilize the ear hair as a receptor that reflects off our pray.
Ian: Men's ears are on their heads.
4. Phil B. - Castle Shannon, PA ~ what?
Paul: Oh, sorry I didn't know you were on the phone.
Ian: I'll break your arm...
5. Jared A.- Lakewood NY ~can I slap you if you a wearing a banana costume?
Paul: Yes, you may. It would be assumed if I was near you in a banana costume, trouble is inevitable anyways.
Ian: A slap on the back maybe for inventing the banana costume, which as far as you know, I did. (Or slap me with a lawsuit if you're the guy who actually invented the banana costume [loosens collar]...